![]() ![]() I’m not sure which of the two I prefer, as I am a still photographer who is very new to video and trying to learn about this.īut I disagreed with the first 5 minutes of the video. Logarithmic recording mode gives a greater dynamic range of light *at the expense* of color information. And I concur 100% with the info presented in the last minute of the video. I’m very open to the idea that shooting in logarithmic range mode may not be preferable to shooting with your camera’s optimized “normal” video mode. Tagged advice, android, c-log, cinelike, cinestyle, color correction, color grading, contrast, damage, davinci resolve, dslr, film look, filmic, filmic pro, final cut pro, flat, free, iOS, iPhone, log, log v2, low light, LUT, LUTs, noise, panasonic, premiere, s-log3, saturation, sharpness, snake oil, sony, spectre luts, tutorial, vegas, vx870, washed out Post navigation UPDATE: There’s a new video I put out that covers a lot of the same ground, but gets more technical and has more examples and information. I usually explain this in mathematical terms, but that can be hard to grasp, so this video serves as a short overview of the things that you should avoid in the realm of picture profiles and saturation/contrast settings.įor a lot more information about this subject, this article will satisfy most of your curiosities: YouTube video experts don’t understand why flat/log footage on 8-bit cameras is a bad idea ![]() Shooting log, shooting flat, using LUTs, turning down the contrast…stop doing these things! Unless you have a 10-bit capable camera, shooting with log profiles like Cine-D, V-Log, C-Log, S-log, or Technicolor CineStyle will only damage your footage and limit what you can do with it in post-production. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |